Ga. Supreme Court justices hear arguments at Mercer

Georgia Public BroadcastingNovember 19, 2013 

The Georgia Supreme Court has heard cases at Mercer University’s law school before. But Tuesday was the first time since Mercer law graduate Hugh P. Thompson became chief justice this summer.

“(My wife Jane and I) lived over in married housing about where the new football field house is,” Thompson said, exercising a moment of judicial privilege before getting down to business.

Thompson, who lives in Milledgeville, reminded the many law students and faculty in attendance that the antebellum state Supreme Court was based in Milledgeville but traveled from circuit to circuit. The contemporary court sits almost exclusively in Atlanta.

“We don’t normally make house calls,” Thompson said to chuckles. But the court does generally visit one law school each year to give students an up-close look at the highest levels of judicature.

The first of two cases the justices heard at Mercer involved one of the world’s richest companies. In Danforth vs. Apple Inc., a woman is appealing a lower court’s order that she stay away from all Apple stores worldwide.

Catherine E. Danforth was fired in August 2012 from her job at the Lenox Square Apple store in Atlanta. She has a history of mental illness and was prone to outbursts, Apple’s lawyers claim in their court filings.

After months in which she allegedly stalked her former co-workers, sent harassing emails and text messages and left notes in employees-only areas of the store, Apple lawyers sought and received a temporary restraining order against Danforth.

Earlier this year, a Cobb County Superior Court judge issued a permanent injunction ordering Danforth to refrain from contact with Apple employees and to stay at least 500 feet away from any Apple store for three years.

In their questioning, the justices appeared sympathetic to the spirit behind the injunction, but skeptical of the specifics.

“If she got a (Facebook) friend request from an Apple employee, a new hire, someone she never met, and she responded, that would seem to put her at risk of being prosecuted as a felon,” Justice David E. Nahmias said during the Apple attorney’s argument.

The second case justices heard could have big implications for private college police forces across the state, and while it doesn’t involve Mercer, the outcome could affect it.

In Hartley vs. Agnes Scott College, a young woman sued campus police at the private women’s college in Decatur for false arrest, among other things.

The Georgia Court of Appeals determined that the privately hired officers are immune because they were functioning as agents of the state, like sheriff’s deputies or state troopers.

Georgia, like other states, has a law on the books that gives qualified, sworn campus police officers the power to enforce the law within their jurisdiction.

But the government doesn’t like the idea that it could be held accountable for the actions of officers who don’t work for it.

“This is the first and only time that we know of that a court in Georgia has extended immunity to a private individual acting on behalf of a private entity, not acting on behalf of a state government entity,” Senior Assistant Attorney General Loretta Pinkston said during her argument.

Accepting some level of responsibility for campus police wouldn’t threaten the state treasury, argued Laurie Webb Daniel, the attorney for Agnes Scott.

“These private schools contribute millions of dollars collectively every year to law enforcement, a need that otherwise would have to be covered by the public at public expense,” she said.

The justices peppered the attorneys in the case with aggressive questions.

Many Mercer law students looked on with shocked expressions, including first-year student Tyler Bishop.

Asked if the experience gave him second thoughts about his chosen profession, Bishop said: “To me, it was just like sitting in class. The professors have very, very in-depth questions.”

Justices will issue rulings in both cases in four to six months.

The Telegraph is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service