Logout | Member Center

About

UGA athletics with beat writer Seth Emerson



About the author

Seth Emerson has been covering the SEC and Georgia (on and off) since 2002. He worked at the Albany Herald from 2002-05, then spent five years at The State in Columbia, S.C., covering South Carolina. He returned to Athens in August of 2010, only to find that David Pollack and David Greene were no longer playing for the Bulldogs. Adjustments were made.

Emerson is originally from Silver Spring, Md., and graduated from Maryland in 1998 with a degree in journalism and a minor ingetting lost on the way to practically everywhere. Then he spent four years at The Washington Post, covering small colleges, a couple NCAA basketball tournaments, and on one glorious day, was yelled at by Tony Kornheiser. It was probably at The Post that he also learned to write in the third person.

These days he lives in Athens with his beloved and somewhat wimpy dog, Archie. Together they fight crime at night in northeast Georgia, except on nights there is no crime, in which case they sit at home, sip on white wine and watch reruns of "Mad Men."

SEC hoops schedule might go beyond 18 games

By Seth Emerson on 01/25/12 08:51
semerson@macon.com

ATHENS - It's all but official now what was reported in this space back in September - the SEC will expand to an 18-game schedule for men's basketball next year.

But how that schedule will look, and future scheduling, remain up in the air.

In conversations with a few people around the league, including Georgia athletics director Greg McGarity before Tuesday's Georgia-Kentucky game, this is how it stands:

- Further expansion of the schedule to 19 games is a serious possibility. The thinking there would be to keep a schedule consistent with divisions: for instance, East teams playing each other twice, and the Western teams once.

- But the SEC is stil unlikely to go back to using divisions. It would only use the East-West setup for scheduling. Why not go back to divisions? McGarity said the old way hurt the "perception" of the SEC's teams when it came to the NCAA tournament selections. (The thinking is that finishing fifth in a good division isn't a fair indicator of a team's performance, nor is finishing first in a bad division.)

The other reason is seeding for the SEC tournament. The league went to one set of standings for this season so that teams from a weaker division wouldn't automatically receive byes to the SEC tournament. (And this year the top three teams are Kentucky, Vanderbilt and Florida. They're all likely to get byes, whereas in previous years one of them would have had to play a first-round game.)

It also helps the league from an RPI perspective to have two or three more games against league teams, rather than the Caniuses and Jackson States of the world.

- Financially, expanding the league schedule is a great thing for almost every team. They get to add at least one more marquee home game, and the SEC gets to go to ESPN and CBS with more conference games.

The exception is Kentucky, which can sell out Rupp Arena for almost every game. John Calipari has been pretty open that he doesn't like the schedule expansion, worrying it would mean sacrificing a game against North Carolina, Indiana or another marquee opponent.

But the vote in the room is 11-1 - or now 13-1.

When this will all be decided remains an open question. It could be put off until the annual league meetings in Destin, Fla., this summer. The SEC has approached this in much the same way as its football schedule: By first figuring out the plan for 2012, then resolving the future plan later.

CareerBuilder

QUICK JOB SEARCH